Read Case 12.1 in Ch. 12, “Followership,” of Leadership: Theory and Practice.
How did followers in this case act in ways that contribute to the power of destructive leaders and their goals? What was the debilitating impact their actions had on the organization?
Based on Lipman-Blumen’s psychological factors that contribute to harmful leadership, explain why those who could have reported Sandusky’s behaviors chose not to.
Based on the outcome, where did Paterno’s intentions go wrong? In what ways could followers have changed the moral climate at Penn State?
In the end, who carries the burden of responsibility regarding the failure of Paterno’s program—the leaders or the followers? Defend your answer.
Sample Solution
The post “Followership,” of Leadership appeared first on homework handlers.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
