Building on the Strategic Planning and Development assignment from Week 3, prepare a 10-slide Microsoft PowerPoint presentation, with narration, with speaker notes of your plan to present to the executive committee.
In this assignment, use the health care organization in your Week 3 assignment. Determine why you are embarking on this strategic planning process, (securing funding, establishing, and focusing on organizational priorities, and so on).
I HAVE UPLOADED MY TEXTBOOK,
WEEK 6 ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS.
THE GRADING RUBRIC.
I HAVE ALSO UPLOADED WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT WHICH IS WHAT YOU WILL USE TO COMPLETE WEEK 6 ASSIGNMENT.
Peer review references are required for all work in this class. I will not accept websites that are not creditable. I will accept federal and state websites in addition to current peer review journal articles and your textbook and assigned supplemental reading material for the course. I am looking for research to support your arguments and thoughts on our topics. Please let me know if you have any questions about these requirements.
FOLLOW ALL INSTRCUTIONS WITHIN THE RUBRICS AND MAKE SURE YOU USE THE REQUIRED FORMATS.
Week 6 Assignment 1 – Strategic Planning Implementation and Evaluation
Introduction
Building on the Strategic Planning and Development assignment from Week 3, prepare a 10-slide Microsoft PowerPoint presentation, with narration, with speaker notes of your plan to present to the executive committee.
In this assignment, use the health care organization in your Week 3 assignment. Determine why you are embarking on this strategic planning process, (securing funding, establishing, and focusing on organizational priorities, and so on).
In this presentation:
· Establish a clear vision for the strategic planning process.
· Paint a picture of where your organization will be going and of your desired outcomes.
· Ensure the picture is reality and not just what you or your executive committee may want to have happen.
· Make certain the strategic plan allows employees to know why the organization is changing.
Assignment Format: MAKE SURE YOU USE THE REQUIRED FORMATS.
And give speaker notes below each slide with in-text citations throughout all slides that have information on them.
Your 10-slide PowerPoint presentation should follow this format:
Slide 1: Cover Slide
· Include the title of your presentation, your name, the course number, and course title, your professor’s name, the university’s name, and the date.
Slide 2: Background/Executive Summary
· The title of this slide should be Executive Summary.
· Describe the details of the situation.
· Use bullets with short phrases.
Slide 3: Thesis Statement
· The title of this slide should be Thesis Statement.
· Identify the focus of your research.
Slides 4–9: Support
· Support your thesis statement following the SESC formula: state, explain, support, and
conclude. (Use Sublevel 1 and 2 Headings to provide coherence and organization.)
· Provide in-text citations using the format in the Strayer Writing Standards.
· Slides should be concise—basically no more than seven bullets per slide and no more than seven words per bullet.
· Most information in a PowerPoint presentation should be contained within the notes section.
Slide 10: References
· Locate at least three peer-reviewed journal articles to support your work. For example, to
identify clinical quality that does not compare to other hospitals, see the U.S. Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Compare site.
· Use APA format for your references. Use peer review articles.
Assignment Instructions
Your presentation must include all of the elements listed below, so be sure to address each point. You may also want to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion in the scoring guide to see how your work will be assessed:
1. Determine why you are embarking on this strategic planning process.
2. Analyze the difference between strategic management, strategic thinking, strategic planning, and managing strategic momentum.
3. Justify the analytical tool that will be the most effective in helping the organization achieve its
strategic plan: support proposal with example of how it will be used.
4. Examine the three internal and three external factors that you discovered during your research that could be barriers to the success of your proposed strategic plan; discuss solutions to each of
the barriers.
5. Examine the most effective manner of reaching the specific segments of the market that your
organization’s strategic plan will target.
6. Evaluate how well the strategic plan you have developed aligns with the organization’s mission and vision. Recommend at least one solution to track the effectiveness of your strategic plan.
7. Use at least three quality academic resources. USE BASIC SEARCH: ONLINE RESOURCES AND PEER REVIEW ARTICLES
8. Meet requirements for clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting.
Scoring Guide
| 1. Determine why you are embarking on this strategic planning process. 15 % | Does not determine why to embark on this strategic planning process. | Partially determines why to embark on this strategic planning process but rationale lacks clarity | Satisfactorily determines why to embark on this strategic planning process | Thoroughly determines why to embark on this strategic planning process; rationale is logical, concise and demonstrates understanding of the strategic planning process. |
| 2. Analyze the difference between strategic management, strategic thinking, strategic planning, and managing strategic momentum. 15 % | Does not analyze the difference between strategic management, strategic thinking, strategic planning, and managing strategic momentum. | Partially analyzes the difference between strategic management, strategic thinking, strategic planning, and managing strategic momentum; analysis is flawed or missing critical information. | Satisfactorily analyzes the difference between strategic management, strategic thinking, strategic planning, and managing strategic momentum. | Thoroughly analyzes the difference between strategic management, strategic thinking, strategic planning, and managing strategic momentum; analysis is exemplary and well written. |
| 3. Justify the analytical tool that will be the most effective in helping the organization achieve its strategic plan; support proposal with example of how it will be used. 15 % | Does not justify the analytical tool that will be the most effective in helping the organization achieve its strategic plan; does not support proposal with example of how it will be used. | Partially justifies the analytical tool that will be the most effective in helping the organization achieve its strategic plan; provides partial support for proposal of how it will be used | Satisfactorily justifies the analytical tool that will be the most effective in helping the organization achieve its strategic plan; supports proposal with example of how it will be used. | Thoroughly justifies the analytical tool that will be the most effective in helping the organization achieve its strategic plan; fully supports proposal with strong example of how it will be used. |
| 4. Examine the three internal and three external factors that you discovered during your research that could be barriers to the success of your proposed strategic plan; discuss solutions to each of the barriers. 15 % | Does not examine the three internal and three external factors that could be barriers to the success of proposed strategic plan; does not discuss solutions to the barriers. | Partially examines the three internal and three external factors that could be barriers to the success of proposed strategic plan; discusses some solutions to the barriers but work has omissions or is not fully supported. | Satisfactorily examines the three internal and three external factors that could be barriers to the success of proposed strategic plan; discusses the solutions to each of the barriers. | Thoroughly examines the three internal and three external factors that could be barriers to the success of proposed strategic plan; discusses solutions to each of the barriers using research and examples. |
| 5. Examine the most effective manner of reaching the specific segments of the market that your organization’s strategic plan will target. 15 % | Does not examine the most effective manner of reaching the specific segments of the market that the organization’s strategic plan will target. | Partially examines the most effective manner of reaching the specific segments of the market that the organization’s strategic plan will target; examination is flawed and overlooks important details. | Satisfactorily examines the most effective manner of reaching the specific segments of the market that the organization’s strategic plan will target. | Thoroughly examines the most effective manner of reaching the specific segments of the market that the organization’s strategic plan will target; examination is insightful and credible. |
| 6. Evaluate how well the strategic plan you have developed aligns with the organization’s mission and vision. Recommend at least one solution to track the effectiveness of your strategic plan. 15 % | Does not evaluate how well the strategic plan aligns with the organization’s mission and vision. Does not recommend at least one solution to track the effectiveness of the strategic plan. | Partially evaluates how well the strategic plan aligns with the organization’s mission and vision. Recommends at least one solution to track the effectiveness of the strategic plan, but work is incomplete or lacks analytical depth. | Satisfactorily evaluates how well the strategic plan aligns with the organization’s mission and vision. Recommends at least one solution to track the effectiveness of the strategic plan. | Thoroughly evaluates how well the strategic plan aligns with the organization’s mission and vision. Recommends at least one solution to track the effectiveness of the strategic plan; evaluation is exemplary, and recommendations are credible. |
| 7. Use at least three quality academic resources. 5 % | Does not use at least three quality academic resources. | Uses at least three quality academic resources, but references are poor quality or contain improperly formatted in-text citations. | Uses at least three quality academic resources. | Uses at least three quality academic resources; all references are high quality choices and intext citations and references are error free. |
| 8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. 5 % | More than 8 errors present. | 5–6 errors present. | 3–4 errors present. |
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
