After you read Julian Savulescue, Norman Daniels, and Michael Sandel’s articles, write a response paper in which you discuss all three articles. Here are some questions to help you with your response. You definitely do not have to answer all of these questions. You should start by stating your position and the questions that you choose to answer should help you to construct your arguments.
Does genetic enhancement undermine our humanity?
Is the distinction between treatment and enhancement arbitrary?
What should be the reason that determines who will be treated and who will not?
Could we provide clear guidance to the moral boundaries between what is obligatory and nonobligatory, permissible and not permissible?
Does justice require treating cases similarly whatever the source or reason that leads to them?
Considering that our resources are limited, how can we decide when we are morally obliged to provide treatment?
Does allowing enhancement eliminate physical and health inequality?
Do you agree that when we design children we objectify and instrumentalize them?
What do you think about the value of “open to the unbidden”? Does genetic enhancement contradict this value?
If healing overrides the person/child natural capacities, should we not permit them?
Does the drive to mastery misses and destroys the appreciation of the gifted character of human power and achievement?
What is the difference between gift and enhancement?
Why is it important to appreciate the gifted character of human powers and achievements and to recognize that our talents and powers are not wholly our own doing?
Sample Solution
The post The Ethics of Enhancement appeared first on homework handlers.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
